Thursday, September 22, 2011
The Crying of Lot 49 Chapter 1 Commentary
Right off the bat, this chapter had some very interesting actions and descriptions. When Oedipa first learns that she has been named the "executrix" of Pierce Inverarity's estate, Pynchon launches into a description of her response..."Oedipa stood in the living room, stared at by the greenish dead eye of the TV tube, spoke the name of God, tried to feel as drunk as possible. But this did not work." I think Pynchon is creating a bridge of shared features with the reader through this description because it is very relatable. Although the reader does not yet know what kind of relationship the pair shared, they are able to imagine themselves in a similar situation, and the responses they have when something shocks them. It took me a few times of reading the first page to really understand the background, but once I was able to I found it to be interesting. The imagery of the "greenish dead eye of the TV tube" alludes to a darker, mysterious side of their relationship and leaves the reader wondering how Pierce died and why he left his estate to the trust of Oedipa. As the chapter continues on, some of these questions are answered, but additional questions are also formed. I began to question the dynamic of Oedipa and Mucho, and how the estate might affect their relationship. There is an interesting contrast brought up between Pierce and Mucho in relation to their social status. While Pierce had a good deal of money, he died early and he lost Oedipa. Mucho, on the other hand, does not have a great job but he is still alive and is married (although his wife does seem to have connections with other men). In addition, there is a large focus on altered mental states, through references to drugs and alcohol which I am interested to see if it will continue throughout the rest of the plot.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I like how you were able to analyze specific details and use quotes to back up your evidence. I also like how you ended your post with a sense of curiosity, questioning what the rest of the story will bring.
ReplyDeleteAn example of a drug reference Pynchon uses is when Oedipa is talking with Dr. Hilarius, "her shrink or psychotherapist." He calls her in the middle of the night and the dialogue goes as follows: "I didn't wake you up, did I," he began, dry. "You sound so frightened. How are the pills, not working?" I'm not taking them," she said. "You feel threatened by them?" "I don't know what's inside them." "You don't believe they're only tranquilizers."
ReplyDeletePynchon gives the reader some insight into Pierce and Oedipa's relationship through the Rapunzel reference. He says, "When it turned out to be Pierce she'd happily pulled out the pins and curlers and down it tumbled in its whispering, dainty avalanche, only when Pierce had gotten maybe halfway up, her lovely hair turned, through some sinister sorcery, into a great unanchored wig, and down he fell, on his ass." In the beginning, "Rapunzel," or Oedipa, is described as "happily" putting down her hair to help Pierce up. However, in the end, Pierce ended up "falling on his ass." Because their relationship went sour, it makes me wonder if Pierce named Oedpia "executrix" of the estate in order to get back at her for breaking his heart.
Vocabulary Words:
1. Sinister: giving the impression that something harmful or evil is happening or will happen
2. Executor: a person or institution appointed by a testator to carry out the terms of their will.
3. Mogul: an important or powerful person, esp. in the motion picture or media industry.
4. Ambiguity: uncertainty or inexactness of meaning in language
5. Convoluted: extremely complex and difficult to follow
6. Ambivalent: having mixed feelings or contradictory ideas about someone or something